COMPARATIVE AND DOGMATIC ISSUES OF HATE SPEECH - TRADITIONAL AND MODERN ACTS OF COMMISSION

Given that the criminal offense of Public Incitement to Violence and Hatred seeks protect public order but also certain groups individuals limit freedom speech, paper provides a comparative legal analysis this through Anglo-Saxon continental law especially refers EU Member States. The analyzes some dogmatic principles explain conditions when can be committed. Especially, development modern technology way communication influence considered in possibility affect different people incitement hate speech. Hate crime precedes riots times social turbulence lead offenses economic, cultural, environmental positive society. gives broader insight into committed, taking account act committing Hatred, connecting it forms “non-public“ traditional commission or using technologies (Social Networks, AI,...) issue special intent.